|
What is Marriage?

When I counsel
young couples, I ask them, "What is marriage?" They may give me many
romantic ideas about marriage, but they often miss the foundation.
Marriage is a
commitment. It is an allegiance bonding two into one flesh. Marriage does not
depend on whether you have good times or bad times together. You are still
married. Through sickness or health, the commitment remains. No matter what
happens through the years, you are married until death do you part.
It is the same
with us as we become the Bride of Christ. It is immaterial what our walk is with
Christ. We are walking with Christ through good times and bad. Apostle Paul
asks, "What will separate us from the love of Christ?" (Romans 8:35)
He concludes that nothing will separate us. Our walk with Christ is for all
eternity.
State promotes adultery
In the early
70's, lawyers were drinking and partying because of a new law that was going to
greatly increase their business. My wife, Rachel, came home from the law offices
where she worked and said the new law would make it possible for residents of
Oregon to receive a divorce much easier. Under the new provisions, a divorce
could be granted simply because the couple was having "irreconcilable
differences."
Prior to the
passage of this law, it was time-consuming and expensive to obtain a divorce.
The state recognized a Godly form of marriage. Once united, the couple was bound
"until death do us part." A divorce was granted only for a few
specific reasons, usually because of marital unfaithfulness. And this charge had
to be proved.
Why were the
lawyers jumping up and down about the new divorce law? They knew that having
easy divorce meant more people divorcing and more revenue for lawyers. Now, 20
years later we are seeing the fruit of this law upon this adulterous generation.
Staged Polygamy
The problem we
are dealing with, is that the state does not acknowledge true marriage. The
state has made an abomination of marriage. The state is promoting polygamy. Not
bigamy, but polygamy. Polygamy means having two or more wives or husbands at the
same time.
The state has
made a revenue base out of man's desire to have multiple marriages. They say,
"You can have polygamy, but you must stage out your wives. For a small fee
we will give you a marriage license and for a greater fee we will grant you a
divorce," which is no divorce at all.
Once you obtain
the paper saying you are divorced, you can legally sleep with another woman and
have children by that woman. However, you are still obligated to continue
financing the previous wife and children. When you finish with that wife, you
pay the state more fees and obtain a second divorce. Then you remarry with
another small fee and when you tire of her, you pay the state the larger fee to
set you free to marry a third time. This continues on, and all the while the
state makes volumes of revenue off of your polygamy.
As a Christian,
I do not recognize this form of multiple marriages. I cannot find anything in
the Holy Scriptures that describes what the state promotes. Unfortunately, what
the state is doing is allowing people to believe that they are able to
"undo" a marriage and then unite with another partner. But the state
has problems because they are still subject to God. The state recognizes that
you cannot just walk away from a marriage. You still have responsibilities to
your wife and children. If you are a divorced male, you become entangled in
child support payments, visitation rights and a host of other problems. You try
to start a new life with a new spouse, but the old marriage does not die. Life
becomes nothing but a nightmare for all those involved. And the children suffer
greatly.
Not only does
the state promote these ungodly relationships, but the corporate churches
condone them. The state has a harlot known as the churches and they are riding
upon the state. The preachers of these churches are aligned with the state in
promoting polygamy. They are binding people together in the name of the state,
instead of the Lord Jesus Christ. They marry people under the authority of a
state marriage license. The harlot Church cannot preach the word of God on
marriage because they are beholden to the state. They don't want to lose their
tax exempt status and other benefits. Therefore, they go along with the state's
ideas on marriage and divorce.
What I have
described is happening all over America. It is Sodom and Gomorrah, a
"wicked and adulterous generation." The men are like well-fed lusty
stallions; every one neighing after his neighbor's wife (Jeremiah 5:8).
An adulterous
generation is attacking the very heart of the forest. The trees in this forest
are now diseased. The trees no longer have loyalty to another human being. If
you have no loyalty to your original marriage or to your spouse or your
offspring, then neither will you have loyalty to Jesus Christ or God the Father.
Because of "irreconcilable differences," you part company and do
whatever you want.
I have an old
saying, "Whatever you see in a microscope, is also true in a
telescope." If you can look into a microscope and see an atom with all its
electrons moving around, it looks just like the solar system with the planets
traveling around the sun. It is just on a different scale.
We are talking
about the same thing in our family relations and in our relationship with God.
On the small scale of a microscope, we see a family being destroyed because the
husband and wife have no more loyalty to each other. We see a couple who are one
flesh being ripped and torn apart.
On the large
scale of the telescope, we see men and women being ripped and torn apart from
God Almighty. Once they were bonded to God, but then "irreconcilable
differences," arose and they divorced God and married other gods. Now they
are committing idolatry. Idolatry in the large realm of God is the same as
adultery in the small realm of family. In the microscope we see the destruction
of the family, in the telescope we see the destruction of society.
|
And I say unto you, Whosoever shall
put away his WIFE, EXCEPT IT BE FOR FORNICATION, and shall marry
another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away
doth commit adultery. Matthew 19:9
|
Doesn't Matthew
19:9 allow a man to divorce his wife if she commits adultery?
No. The New
Testament gives no grounds for divorce. When Jesus made an exception to the
marriage law at Matthew 5:32 and 19:9, it was for a betrothed wife, not a real
wife.
Betrothed wife
To understand
why the word WIFE is used at Matthew 5:32 and 19:9, we need to know a little
about Jewish customs because Matthew was writing to a Jewish audience. Jews had
a social practice called "BETROTHAL," which is similar to engagement
today. Betrothal starts when a couple agrees to give themselves to each other in
marriage and ends in the actual marriage. Jewish betrothal
is different from modern-day engagement in one significant way. Once a couple
was betrothed, they were regarded by the rest of society as "one
flesh" and were called husband and wife. Usually within a year to eighteen
months after becoming betrothed, the couple consummated the marriage.
In modern
society during the period of engagement, if the couple change their minds, they
break up and start over again. In Jewish society, however, once a couple is
betrothed, they could not just call it quits. A betrothed couple in Jewish
society had to obtain a LEGAL DIVORCE. Even though they were only engaged and
had never lived together as man and wife, they were considered married and must
get a divorce if they wanted to separate. This custom can be proved from the
scriptures.
Mary is called "wife"
Look at Matthew
1:18-20 and 24-25. Here is a passage most of us have read many times and
possibly missed a powerful truth that reveals this Jewish custom. Notice that
Joseph and Mary are called HUSBAND and WIFE, even though they were only
betrothed or engaged:
|
Now the birth of Jesus Christ was
on this wise; When as his mother Mary was ESPOUSED (engaged) to Joseph,
before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.
Then Joseph HER HUSBAND, (espoused, but called husband) being a just
man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her
away privily. (literally, divorce her)
|
Notice that
even though they had not yet consummated the marriage, Joseph was considering
divorcing Mary.
|
But while he thought on these
things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream,
saying, "Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee
MARY, THY WIFE: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy
Ghost."
|
|
Then Joseph being raised from
sleep, did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him and took unto him HIS
WIFE: and KNEW HER NOT till she had brought forth her firstborn son; and
she called his name Jesus.
|
Jesus, being
raised in Jewish society, was aware of this Jewish custom of being considered
husband and wife during the betrothal period. Matthew records this special
provision, not as a universal exception, but only as a clarification to the Jews
concerning the betrothal relationship. The exception is for a betrothed couple
when FORNICATION is committed BEFORE their marriage vows make them one flesh for
life. The principle of the permanency of marriage that Jesus teaches applies
only to those who have consummated their marriage, not to those who are merely
betrothed.
No exception in parallel passages
With this
understanding of Jewish custom, Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 concur with the other
parallel passages of Luke 16:18 and Mark 10:11. If we take out the "EXCEPT
IT BE FOR FORNICATION" clause, then Matthew 19:9 is almost identical to
Luke 16:18:
|
Whosoever shall put away his wife
and shall marry another, committeth adultery; and whoso marrieth her
which is put away doth commit adultery. (Matthew 19:9 with fornication
clause removed).
|
|
Whosoever putteth away his wife,
and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her
that is put away from her husband committeth adultery. Luke 16:18
|
Matthew 19:9
appears to make an exception to the marriage covenant that is not made in the
parallel passages at Mark 10:11 and Luke 16:18. But when the passage is viewed
without the exception clause, it harmonizes with the rest of the New Testament
teachings on marriage.
Fornication vs adultery
Another reason
we know the exception clause is referring to a BETROTHED WIFE and not a real
wife, is that Jesus makes the exception for FORNICATION, not for adultery.
FORNICATION is illicit sex between an UNMARRIED couple. If Jesus was referring
to a real wife, why didn't He say "except it be for adultery"?
The
word translated "fornication" is "porneia" in Greek. "Porneia"
generally means illicit sexual relations between an UNMARRIED couple. If a real
wife were unfaithful, she would commit adultery, not fornication.
The modern
translations sometimes confuse the issue because they translate the Greek word
PORNEIA not as fornication, but as the general term "sexual
immorality." However, none of the modern translations we have seen
translate PORNEIA as adultery.
If Jesus meant
to say adultery is grounds for divorce, why wasn't a derivative of the Greek
word "Moichao" used? That is the word translated as adultery in the
same verse. "Moichao" (adultery) occurs when a married person violates
wedlock.
Let us assume
that fornication means adultery in Matthew 5:32 and 19:9. Then we could assume
that if a spouse commits adultery, it is grounds for divorce and subsequently,
remarriage. But how can this be? It flies in the face of what Jesus and Apostle
Paul speak about so clearly elsewhere in the New Testament. Earlier in Matthew,
Chapter 19, verse 6, Jesus says that a man and woman are joined as one flesh and
no man can divide them. To seek a divorce, is to allow a man to
separate what God has put together. Both Jesus and Apostle Paul teach that
those who divorce and marry another commit adultery. Once the marriage has been
consummated, there are no escape clauses. Marriage is until death do you part.
Only death ends marriage
Paul confirms
Jesus' teaching of being one flesh for life by saying in effect:
If you
separate, stay single or reunite with your only spouse, for if you do remarry
before your partner dies, you are an adulterer or an adulteress; and adulterers
SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD. (See 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 and 7:11)
When one becomes
a eunuch, he cannot go back to his former state. When one marries, they cannot
go back to the unmarried state. Marriage is permanent. No wonder Christ's
disciples said to Him, "If such is the case of the man with his wife, it is
better not to marry" (Matthew 19:10).
Does Jesus allow
a man to divorce his wife because of adultery? No, the scripture remains true,
the only way out of marriage is death.
|
For the woman which hath an husband
is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the
husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. So then if,
while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be
called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that
law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.
Romans 7:2-3
|
The blood covenant
Marriage is
founded upon the commitment of a man and a woman giving their lives and their
fortunes to each other, binding them into one whole. The woman comes under the
covering of the man. The man has an obligation to that woman, "till death
do they part," to be her covering. He is to take care of her and to have
children by her, through good times and bad times, through health and in
sickness. He is not going to be able to have just the good times. He is also
going to have to go through the bad times. Marriage does not hinge upon whether
it is an exciting time or an unexciting time. Marriage remains a lifetime
commitment that is not dependent upon circumstances.
Marriage is a
covenant between two people. Some say it is a "blood covenant." The
woman, a virgin, spills her blood on their wedding night. Blood binds the
covenant. This is not always true because there are situations where a spouse
dies, and the other is free to remarry. In that instance, if the widow
remarries, there is no blood spilt, but there is still a covenant, "until
death do us part."
No sin in first marriage
What about all
of the families who followed the state and thought they could divorce and
remarry? People come up to me and say, "I wasn't a Christian back in the
days of my first marriage. Now I'm on my second marriage. Is my first marriage
forgiven so that I can remain with my second wife?"
I ask one
question. What is there to forgive on your first marriage? Is it not your lawful
marriage? There is nothing to forgive. What are you asking for? You are asking
to remain in adultery. I find everybody looking for justification to remain in
adultery. If you have a problem, why not seek out the way you can undo your
adultery? The first step is to leave the adulterous relationship. If there are
children involved, you are still responsible for them, but cut out the adultery.
Walk away from it. You cannot remain there.
That is step
number one. That is repentance. To repent of an adulterous relationship, is to
quit committing adultery. It is like everything else. If you are angry, how do
you repent of anger? You quit being angry. To have a repentant attitude, is to
quit doing it. If you find you are an alcoholic, what is repentance? Quit
drinking. Stop going to the persons, places and things that cause you to drink.
The same thing is true with an adulterous relationship. If you are in adultery,
how do you repent? You must leave the relationship. That is step number one.
What if you want
to be married? Then go back to your original wife or husband.
"But they
have already remarried," you say.
Who married
them? God does not recognize their marriage. They are in an adulterous
relationship. It is an adulterous generation. Everybody is in adultery and it
seems nobody is sleeping with their God-ordained partner.
The problem is
that the state, who has been promoting polygamy in a structured manner, is also
going to prevent you from going back to your spouse. What you are fighting is
not God. You are fighting the state. And the state is fighting God.
|